close
close

Semainede4jours

Real-time news, timeless knowledge

    • Too many subplots and deepfakes ruin ‘Here’
    bigrus

    Too many subplots and deepfakes ruin ‘Here’

    Harry Posted on

    play

    The beloved “Forest Gump” trio of director Robert Zemeckis and actors Tom Hanks and Robin Wright reunite to tell another heartbreaking and heart-warming story.

    “Here” is the story of a house; so technically it’s a single plot of land, but it’s essentially a house and its various occupants. Filmed entirely with a single camera that overlooks the entire living room, the audience watches life unfold before their eyes.

    Deaths, births, holidays, meteors that destroyed the dinosaurs, weddings, funerals; I mean, you name it and you’ll probably see it in this movie.

    I wish I was kidding about the dinosaur thing.

    What “Here” cannot do is allow itself to revel in simplicity. As a fan of slice-of-life movies, this was the perfect opportunity to tell a story about intergenerational trauma, forgiveness, regret, loss, love, and every other emotion in between.

    While Hanks and Wright manage to pull off the impossible by somehow being effectively emotive despite the overuse of anti-aging technology, it’s not enough to save the film from feeling gimmicky rather than real.

    What is ‘Here’ about?

    Adapted from Richard McGuire’s graphic novel of the same name, “Here” tells the story of every family living in a certain region, from prehistory to the 2020 pandemic.

    The film cuts back and forth between past, present, and future, showing the man who invented La-Z-Boy, Benjamin Franklin visiting his son who lives across the street from the main house, and the 1900s when an aviation enthusiast and his suffragist wife live together . A Native couple who has learned to move with the times, showing up once or twice. We also see a modern Black family trying to cope with modern issues like police brutality and the 2020 pandemic.

    And yes, we briefly see dinosaurs and their eventual extinction.

    Meanwhile, Richard Young (Hanks) tries to follow the lives of his wife, Margaret (Wright), and their daughter, Vanessa (played by several people), as they try to experience life’s ups and downs, including helping with Richard’s World War II care. II veteran father and mother.

    If this sounds like too much to pack into a 1 hour and 44 minute runtime, that’s because it is.

    I’m sure in a medium like comics, it would make sense to include these subplots about the various inhabitants of this land and the eventual home. It works because McGuire had endless pages to get his point across. Zemeckis has just 104 minutes.

    Not every book or comic can be turned into a movie without modifications. And not every moviegoer wants to sit in the cinema for more than 3 hours.

    While many of the other residents have interesting stories of their own, it becomes difficult to become interested in their fates as events unfold because there is not enough time to connect. On the other hand, we spend a lot of time with the Young family, and over time I found myself growing attached to him.

    Where Zemeckis went wrong was not cutting minor plot points and not focusing on the standout story, the Youngs, but also relying on de-aging technology instead of using old-fashioned stage makeup techniques or simply hiring actors of different ages.

    Tom Hanks and Robin Wright could save ‘This Place’ with their true colors

    All the subplots and sporadic time skip issues aside, I’ll be honest that “Here” nearly brought me to tears on multiple occasions.

    I say almost because the uncanny valley effect on Hanks and Wright’s faces worked when Zemeckis didn’t ruin the truly heartfelt, tear-jerking moments by aggressively adding other subplots.

    Anti-aging technology has its place. Using it to recreate young Luke Skywalker for a single scene in “The Mandalorian” was a good place for this. Almost an entire movie isn’t like that.

    Arguably Hanks and Wright’s greatest strength is their ability to express emotion without too much effort and make it believable. Both naturally ooze chemistry. He even succeeds in this movie, but the use of anti-aging deepfake technology ruins him.

    Both actors have a knack for expressing themselves with heavy makeup to make them look younger or older, but neither can pull off the deepfakes pasted over their own faces. In fact, over the years, I would have preferred to have younger actors portraying them. I just wanted to see the emotion I was persuaded to feel.

    As a whole, I understand what “Here” means: a journey through life, its many complexities and intergenerational parallels. But Zemeckis’ direction and script overcomplicate something that could thrive in simplicity. Instead of letting the cast shine on their own, he opted for new-age technology.

    ‘Here’ 3 stars

    Manager: Robert Zemeckis.

    Casting: Tom Hanks, Robin Wright, Paul Bettany and Kelly Reilly.

    Evaluation: PG-13 for thematic material, some suggestive material, brief strong language, and smoking.

    How to watch: In theaters Friday, November 1.

    More movie reviews: Ralph Fiennes leads an all-star cast in search of a new pope in ‘Conclave’

    Meredith G. White covers entertainment, arts and culture for The Arizona Republic and azcentral.com. He covers the latest news on video games, television, and the best things to do in metro Phoenix.

    Harry
    View all posts

    You Might Also Like