Burleigh: Yes. Who can say? Voters wanted a change. And I see that’s what they’re getting here. A lot of voters just sit there and say, “Yeah, burn it.” They are angry. They didn’t get anything He’s been getting help from Democrats for decades. Things that would make a difference, national health services, minimum wage, were not implemented. The political structure was ready for this, right? It’s been toned down and now they’re angry and probably cheering for it. They cheer and cheer for the mayhem and chaos he brings there With the idea that if the government evaporated or collapsed, everyone would have a better life. I don’t know how this will happen.

But at the same time, Greg, as you know, you’ve been around long enough that there’s anti-government rhetoric going back to Reagan, at least in my lifetime, maybe before, but there’s also growing, simmering anti-government rhetoric.Age, especially in government and the federal government, has been seeded for decades. And now you’re seeing what was planted by the reds and everyone else since Reagan come to fruition.

Sergeant: Yes, I think that’s true. You have to wonder, though, that there is a certain type of undecided and undecided voters who are undecided at least until Election Day. S.wing voters, perhaps Latinos who incorrectly associate Trump with a good economy. But here it is. Many of these voters perhaps see Trump simply as an irritating figure, an anti-status quo figure. You can see from their perspective why they think that way. In 2020, while Trump was in office, he was voted out because he was in office. And somehow, perhaps in part, the law In Trump’s immediate wake, he has once again reconstructed himself as an outsider and disruptor of the status quo that not everyone likes, even though he was once president. This kind of superficial understanding of what Trump represents now looks set to be truly disastrous. Don’t you think so?