MELBOURNE, Australia — The Australian government on Thursday announced what it calls world-leading legislation that would set a 16-year age limit for children to start using social media and hold platforms accountable for ensuring compliance.

Prime Minister: “Social media is harming our children and I am giving it time” Anthony Albanese in question.

The law will be presented to the Parliament in the last two-week session this year, which will start on November 18. Albanese told reporters that the age limit would come into force 12 months after the law is passed.

Platforms like X, TikTok, Instagram and Facebook will need to use this year to figure out how to exclude Australian children under 16.

“I’ve talked to thousands of parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles. “They, like me, are terribly worried about our children’s online safety,” Albanese said.

Social media platforms will be penalized for violating the age limit, but underage children and their parents will not be penalized.

“The onus will be on social media platforms to demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps to block access. “This responsibility will not be on the parents or the young people,” Albanese said.

Antigone Davis, chief of security MetaThe company, which owns Facebook and Instagram, said the company would respect any age restrictions the government wants to impose.

“But what’s missing is a deeper discussion about how we enforce protections, otherwise we run the risk of feeling better as if we’ve taken action, but young people and parents won’t find themselves in a better place,” Davis said in a statement.

He added that more powerful tools in app stores and operating systems so parents can control what apps their children can use would be a “simple and effective solution.”

X did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday. tiktok He declined to comment.

Digital Industry Group Inc., an advocate for the digital industry in Australia, described the age limit as a “20th Century response to the challenges of the 21st Century”.

“Instead of blocking access through bans, we need to take a balanced approach to create age-appropriate spaces, build digital literacy and protect young people from online harm,” DIGI managing director Sunita Bose said in a statement.

more than that 140 Australian and international academics An expert in fields related to technology and child welfare signed an open letter to Albanese last month opposing the social media age limit as “a tool too blunt to address the risks effectively”.

Jackie Hallan, director of youth mental health service ReachOut, opposed the ban. He said 73 per cent of young people accessing mental health support across Australia did so through social media.

“We are disturbed by the ban. We think young people are likely to get around a ban and our concern is that it really drives behavior underground and then if things go wrong young people are less likely to get support from their parents and carers because they’re worried about getting into trouble. Hallan said.

Child psychologist Philip Tam said a minimum age of 12 or 13 would be more feasible.

“My real fear, to be honest, is that the social media problem will be pushed underground,” Tam said.

Australian National University lawyer Assoc. Faith Gordon feared that separating children from the platforms could put pressure on families.

Albanese said there may be exceptions and exemptions in cases such as continuing access to educational services.

However, parental consent does not give a child under 16 the right to access social media.

Earlier this year the government launched an initiative. Trial of age restriction technologies. of Australia e-Safety CommissionerThe online watchdog, which will oversee compliance, will use the results of this trial to provide guidance to platforms on what reasonable steps they can take.

Minister of Communications Michelle Rowland He said that the year-long preliminary implementation would enable the age limit to be implemented in a “very practical way”.

“Penalties need to be increased to ensure compliance,” Rowland said.

“Every company operating in Australia, whether here or elsewhere, is expected to comply with Australian laws or suffer the consequences,” he added.