There is an ongoing debate about whether the fetus is human. Even many Christians believe that Scripture is either silent or vague on the subject of abortion. To answer this question, I look to both Scripture and science.

In terms of science, sonograms and advances in technology have provided clear evidence that babies in the womb exhibit all the characteristics of human life: they have unique DNA, they grow, they move, and they respond to stimuli. Medical science has even shown that they can feel pain. If, as a nation, we did not outlaw abortion and required every woman to see a sonogram of her baby before having an abortion, I believe abortion rates would drop dramatically. When you are faced with the undeniable humanity of the unborn, it becomes increasingly difficult to justify ending that life.

As for Scripture, it is far from ambiguous. In fact, this provides consistent and convincing evidence for the sanctity of life in the womb. Exodus 21:22-25 discusses a scenario in which someone causes the death of an unborn child. The law demands “life for life,” underscoring the intrinsic value God places on unborn life. Equalizing the life of the unborn child with the life of an adult shows that life in the womb is precious and protected by God’s law.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to receive a daily/weekly email with the top news (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

The Bible repeatedly emphasizes that life begins from the moment of conception and is sacred. In Genesis 25:22-23, God acknowledges the distinct identities of Jacob and Esau while they were still in the womb and refers to them as “two nations.” This shows that they have a purpose and destiny even as unborn babies. Job 31:15 confirms that it is God Himself who “forms us both from our mothers,” making every life intentional and precious.

In Psalm 22:9-10, David describes his dependence on God from the womb: “From my mother’s womb you are my God.” Similarly, Psalm 139 praises God’s intimate involvement in our formation; David marvels: “I am fearfully and wonderfully made.” These verses paint a vivid picture of a God who cares deeply about every detail of our development and underscores that life in the womb is not merely biological, but is endowed with divine purpose and value.

Jeremiah 1:5 further confirms this as God revealed to Jeremiah: “I knew you before I formed you in the womb.” This is not just knowledge of a biological process; It speaks of a relationship and purpose for every life, even before birth. Similarly, Isaiah 49:1, 5 describes how God called his servants from the womb and assigned them a purpose that predated their birth.

In the New Testament, Luke 1:41-44 records how John the Baptist leaped into his mother’s womb in response to the presence of the unborn Jesus. This extraordinary interaction between two unborn children points to their personality and awareness. This shows that even in the womb they are more than potential lives, they are already individuals with a purpose, able to respond to the divine.

Contrary to modern claims, the Bible is neither silent nor ambiguous about the value of life in the womb. From Genesis to Revelation, God continually affirms the humanity, purpose, and value of the unborn. The Bible, along with scientific opinions, strongly affirms that life in the womb is sacred and must be protected.

Therefore, Christians’ ignorance on this issue greatly disturbs me. This gives people an excuse to vote for a pro-choice candidate without feeling like they’re violating their conscience. When people ask me if I’m a single-issue voter, I let them know that I look at all issues. But I would add that the most critical issue by far is how we treat the innocent unborn. If someone believes it’s okay to take an unborn human life, then I can’t trust what they have to say about postnatal issues (racism, poverty, and anything related to human flourishing).

If a black person challenged me for being a “one-issue voter,” I would challenge them to consider that they, too, might actually be a one-issue voter. I’ll start by asking a simple question: “Imagine you support a candidate whose policies are 99% aligned with yours, but then you find out he is a member of the KKK. Would you still vote for them?” The almost foolproof answer is no. That’s when I’d say: “Congratulations, you’re a single-issue voter!”

I’ve had this type of conversation more than once, and it always leads to a powerful realization: we all have lines we won’t cross, values ​​we refuse to compromise on, and issues that inherently outweigh others. For some, this is racial justice. For others, it is protecting life, defending the defenseless, or promoting freedom. Whatever the case, these “single issue” values ​​reveal what intrinsically matters most to us.

This isn’t about being narrow-minded or ignoring the broader political landscape. It’s about realizing that certain issues define who we are and what we believe. To examine this issue further, whether or not you are pro-life has huge implications for your worldview. As a result, people with pro-life views often have issues with marriage, family, human sexuality, etc. It is no coincidence that they adhere to biblical perspectives on these issues. In contrast, many pro-choice people are generally more inclined to unbiblical views on marriage. , family, gender, human sexuality, etc.

That’s why I look at the big picture when I vote. I consider the candidate’s policy positions rather than their behavior and personality. This is because policies will affect the entire nation, while personal action (albeit sometimes unbiblical) has a marginal impact on the population. For example, I would rather have a politically incorrect and rude president than a nice, well-cultured, kind president whose policies are contrary to God’s moral laws and who is complicit in taking the lives of innocent unborn children through horrific abortion. laws.

It is not possible for a two-party system to fully reflect and represent God, His holiness and the Bible. None of the candidates in this particular presidential election appeal to me on a personal level. Both have fatal flaws. But my vote will be determined by which one adheres more closely to biblical ethics when it comes to systemic law.

No political party exactly follows the Bible in applying Biblical laws (because we are not a theocracy). We should choose the candidate who is more likely to support the top 10 list in God’s 10 Commandments (Exodus 20).

As believers, we should not allow a political party to exceed our faith or swallow our identity. Of course, there is nothing wrong with a Christian registering as a Democrat or Republican as long as their vote is based on biblical values.

As a result, although it is not possible to expect a country with a two-party political system to fully reflect Christian values, which party is in power will determine the route the nation will follow for future generations. As a result, before people vote, it is vital to understand which candidate and which Party’s platform is more in line with Scripture.

It is every citizen’s responsibility to go out and vote. If every Christian voted based on Biblical principles rather than political affiliation, the United States would prosper and become a great power for decades to come.